Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Argumentative Essay #1


Joshua Hahn-Varona
2/24/15
3D Printing: Why We Should Be Excited
Over the past decade, 3D printing equipment has started to become more and more available to those who wish to build their own printer to start 3D printing at home. As "What is 3D Printing?" says: "Personal 3D printing or domestic 3D printing is mainly for hobbyists and enthusiast." However, over the last few years, not only has 3D printing become cheaper and more readily available, it has also become better in terms of speed and precision. In this year's CES2015 (a technology convention that showcases new and innovative technology) a new product was revealed that may eventually make at home 3D printing a norm. The XYZprinting: Nobel 1.0 is the newest at home 3D printing technology that the author, Hong Ngo, says himself, "The maker of the Da Vinci today unveiled at CES 2015 its first SLA 3D printer, the Nobel 1.0. It's the first on the market to retail at $1,499, which is significantly less than any other 3D printer of its type." and "XYZPrinting says that the Nobel 1.0's strength is not only its speed but also the quality of the print, capable of delivering print resolution of up to 25 microns. From the demo prints I've seen, the quality was indeed a huge leap forward from those printed by the Da Vinci or any other 3D printers I've reviewed. It was hard to believe that they were 3D-printed objects." Though $1,499 isn't necessarily cheap, eventually, the price of this type of product in particular may drop.  Newer, smaller and cheaper models may also be available in the near future for everyone to use, and benefit from. 3D printing is becoming one of the best technological breakthroughs of our time, and we should be looking forward to what 3D printing has to offer in places like manufacturing, medicine and even in our homes.
However, some say that at home 3D printing is going to make it easy for people to have and assemble undetectable weapons that will be abused by criminals that mass produce weapons in their garage. Because of this, it is believed by some that in home 3D printing is a step in the wrong direction as people will be able to use free files from the internet to 3D print weapons. Though I agree this is a huge concern in regards to public safety, I want to focus on the positive aspects of in home 3D printing. 3D printing is the way of the future, it is changing the world.
As "What Is 3D Printing?" explains, 3D printing has many benefits for the consumer along with benefits on the industrial side of things, and how 3D printing will be in the future. The article also shows an infographic at end which shows the history and possible future of 3D printing, along with its current and possible uses.
In terms of in home 3D printing, many things come to my mind of the extensive uses that a 3D printer has to offer. A cool idea I was thinking of was being able to buy a file for cheap from a place like Amazon to 3D print a missing or broken part to really anything. Need a new door knob? 3D print it for little cost. Are you missing an important part to a Do-It-Yourself project? 3D print it for cheap while you assemble the other parts. The list of possible uses goes on to other things, of course. As stated previously, 3D printers used to be mostly for hobbyists. These hobbyists could use 3D printers for, well, their hobbies like model cars. A recent example for this that I personally witnessed was at the Chicago Auto Show 2015. A man (I don’t think he was sponsored by any car companies as he didn’t have any sort of badge on. Just a suit and tie) was showing a 3D printer that was printing very basic model cars. I didn’t have time to talk to him about what he was doing exactly there, but he did let me take a picture of the machine that was in the process of making another model car along with some of the already made cars on display.
Artists may very well have a use for 3D printing, too. A new product on the market called the 3Doodler is a small pen-like instrument that “writes” in 3D. One end of the pen is fed a plastic, cylindrical material that goes through the pen and comes out on the other side of the pen in a liquid form that cools and hardens quickly to create 3D models that you design on the spot. Some of the already designed and tested creations from the 3Doodler include a working rocket, wall sculptures and a remote controlled plane.  The great thing about this product is that it is already available at Michaels giving access to those interested for $99.
That is not to say that in home 3D printing doesn’t have its risks. When it comes to whether 3D printers are safe for home, things get a little foggy. The problem with in home 3D printing comes when people have the ability to make weapons. Cody Wilson is the creator of the first 3D printed handgun called "The Liberator". Since this gun is made of hard plastic, it is undetectable by metal detectors, which is a huge public safety concern. Interestingly enough, Cody Wilson is an anarchist, he basically designed this weapon to scare governments. Since governments cannot  regulate files on the internet to stop people from downloading them off of the internet, the only way to counter in home 3D printed weapons is to ban the production, sales and possession of the weapons. Sadly, criminals will eventually find a way to break the law, but the benefits of having an in home 3D printer outweighs this set back by a large margin.
3D printing has many uses outside of your own home. In the medical field, 3D printing has been used to make cheap prosthetic limbs. As the article here explained “The e-NABLE team recently visited a leading trauma surgeon, Dr. Albert Chi, to show the surgeon their $50 3D printed plastic hand. Dr. Chi saw the potential for this hand and likely many other types of prosthetics, to change the lives of thousands of people worldwide, who could never afford a commercially made $30,000-$50,000 prosthetic.” Cheap prosthetics will benefit anyone in need because of how cheap and available 3D printed prosthetics will become.  There has also been development in 3D printing human tissue by “biotechnology firms and academia for possible use in tissue engineering applications where organs and body parts are built using inkjet techniques. Layers of living cells are deposited onto a gel medium and slowly built up to form three dimensional structures.”  Even working organs to eliminate the need for organ donors as the infographic mentioned above explained.
Another odd but may very well become quite practical use for 3D printing is construction. Recently in China, a fully 3D printed apartment building was built. The first of its kind. It is a five story villa that is 11,840 square feet that also has decorations inside and out. The article also mentioned how the process of 3D printing this apartment building “process saves between 30 and 60 percent of construction waste, and can decrease production times by between 50 and 70 percent, and labour costs by between 50 and 80 percent.” And “In all, the villa costs around $161,000 to build.” This is astonishing to me, as some houses in our area by themselves cost more than this five story apartment building. This idea of cheap architecture  may sound as if construction workers will lose jobs. However, 3D printing homes does not mean that the house is built by the 3D printer, but rather the parts for the house are made by the printer. Basically, you still need builders to put the building together, but the parts of the building are made by a 3D printer. You can think of it as a life-save LEGO project.
Other uses for 3D printing outside of home can be in manufacturing. 3D printers allow manufacturers to “create prototypes or objects that would be impossible to machine.” This is great for manufacturers because fast, testable prototypes will make both cheap and easy to innovate within a company. This is also good for small business owners who can provide printable designs on the internet, as small excerpt from “U.S. Productivity Growth: An optimistic Perspective” points out. The article also talked about how products will be “endlessly customizable- in form, material and dimension.” and how products will both never be out of stock and “manufacturing will become truly just-in-time.”

While the 3D printing technology we have today is still making progress, it is by no means at any sort of halt. In the next 10 to 20 years, 3D printing may have advanced enough to the point where we are saving lives in the matter of minutes. Along with being able to save money on parts for projects or full blown homes for us, 3D printing will let us imagine and then almost instantly create things to better our lives, letting us create 3D works of art as well as advancing enough to save lives in the medical field with cheap prosthetics and quicker, more efficient manufacturing of products all together.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Research with Ch.3 Templates

Joshua Hahn-Varona
2/10/15

Research with Ch.3 Templates

   Over the past decade, 3D printing equipment has started to become and available to those who wish to build their own printer to start 3D printing at home. As "What Is 3D Printing?" says: "Personal 3D printing or domestic 3D printing is mainly for hobbyists and enthusiast."

    Of course, over the last few years, not only has 3D printing become cheaper, more readily available and it has also become better in terms of speed and precision. In this year's CES2015 (a technology convention that showcases new and inovative technology) a new product was revealed that may eventually make at home 3D printing a norm. The XYZprinting: Nobel 1.0 is the newest at home 3D printing technology that the author of the article, Hong Ngo, says himself, "The maker of the Da Vinci today unveiled at CES 2015 its first SLA 3D printer, the Nobel 1.0. It's the first on the market to retail at $1,499, which is significantly less than any other 3D printer of its type." and "XYZPrinting says that the Nobel 1.0's strength is not only its speed but also the quality of the print, capable of delivering print resolution of up to 25 microns. From the demo prints I've seen, the quality was indeed a huge leap forward from those printed by the Da Vinci or any other 3D printers I've reviewed. It was hard to believe that they were 3D-printed objects." Though $1,499 isn't necessarily cheap, eventually, the price of this type of product in particular may drop.  Newer, smaller and cheaper models may also be avaiable in the near future for everyone to use, and benefit from.

Research with Ch.2 Templates

Joshua Hahn-Varona
2/10/2015

Research with Ch.2 Templates

   On one end of the spectrum of 3D printing, 3D printing will give people the option to 3D print weapons for free from files on the internet. Though I agree this is a huge concern in regards to safety, I want to focus on the positive aspects of at home 3D printing.

   As "What Is 3D Printing?" explains, 3D printing has many benefits for the consumer along with benefits on the industrial side of things, and how 3D printing will be in the future.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Research with Ch.1 Templates

Joshua Hahn-Varona
2/10/15

Research with Ch.1 Templates

   Some say 3d printing is going to make it easy for people to have undetectable weapons, that will be abused by criminals to mass produce weapons in their garage. Because of this, it is believed by some that 3d printing is a step in the wrong direction. However, 3d printing is the way of the future, it is changing the world.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

2b or not 2b Summary

Joshua Hahn-Varona
1/28/15

2b or not 2b Summary

   Texting and instant messaging has be come a part of everyone's lives over the last decade. My generation has come to incorporate messaging as a part of our regular routine with ease. However, the older generation of my time may have trouble with learning the new ways of communication and because of this, it is no surprise that some may be completely against texting and instant messaging. So much so that they make emotional, not so thought out arguments as to how texting will ruin language.

   One argument about how texting will ruin language is that abbreviations and acronyms ruin the way people utilize grammar and spelling. Acronyms and abbreviations have been used in language for hundreds of years, as David Crystal explains in "2b or not 2b?" Crystal also talks about how our generation is actually better at reading and writing in part because of texting and instant messaging.

   To be fair to the people who believe texting ruins language, texting and instant messaging have spell check and word correction integrated into them so that people don't completely butcher words. However, texting and instant messaging do not have a grammar check. Because of this, from what I have noticed anyways, many people are unaware of the differences between words like "you're" and "your" and others like "their," "there," and "they're" and is quite annoying to see, but that doesn't mean that these grammar mistakes are destroying language as a whole.

   "2bor not 2b?" gives great insight on how texting and instant messaging actually helps language rather than hurts it, and should be read by anyone who wishes to understand the effects of today's ways of communication.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Community Episode

Community Episode
1/20/15
By Joshua Hahn-Varona

This episode of The Community makes of people who feel that because they have a lot of followers on Twitter or "friends" on Facebook that they are "powerful" people.

They might have called the app "MeowMeowBeenz" becuase cats are a big part of the internet?

Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted

Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted
1/20/15
By Joshua Hahn-Varona

Although Gladwell does not say so directly, he assumes that social media is a weak way of starting revolutions and pushing for social change. This, however, is not the case. Many social revolutions like the Arab Spring revolutions in the early 2000s among other, more recent social revolutions have been started on social media websites such as Twitter.

Though I agree with Gladwell that "friends" and followers on Facebook and Twitter do not necessarily have strong bonds between one another, I think having and being a "friend" or follower can bring people together when it comes to social change.

One thing I noticed about this article was that it was written in 2010. Now I am not one hundred percent sure but, in 2010, Twitter specifically wasn't as much as a part of our lives as it is today. Today, we have Twitter in our morning news. The news castors will say "Tweet us your thought on this with the hash tag: X."  They then show incoming Tweets on screen with people's thought on the recent story.

I don't think Gladwell understands how strong social media can be. Social media is great start to revolutions. Social media may more strongly influence a revolution in some countries than others, but the impact social media has is still significant.